^Otetaanpa yksi tyypillinen esimerkki itsensä äärimmäisen kapea-alaisesta meritoitumisalueestaan (joka on rajoittunut lähinnä PET-skannerilla leikkimiseen ja siitä tuotetun A4-saasteen määrällä kehuskelemiseen) huolimatta kaikkitietäväksi kaikkien alojen yliasiantuntijaksi korottaneen professori Juha Kuutin keskusteluiden tasosta.
Kun Knuutilla ei ole minkäänlaisia asia-argumentteja brittiläisen tiedekirjoittaja Matt Ridleyn
The Times- lehden kolumnissaan esittämien faktojen kumoamiseen, hän käy henkilöönmenevään hyökkäykseen, mikä on sitäkin naurettavampaa kun hän ei edes tiedä kuka Ridley on - jostain Knuuti vain on saanut sellaisen jumalallisen ilmoituksen, että
Juha Knuuti kirjoitti:
Kyseinen henkilö on yksi näistä henkilöistä, jotka väittävät vaikka maapallon litteiksi, jos siitä saa kohua ja rahaa.
Mitähän hän on mahtanut itse tutkia? Millä asiantuntemuksella hän puhuu? Edustaako hän jotain tutkimusryhmää? Medline ei löydä yhtään julkaisua:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=r ... holesterol
Tämä on varmaan hyvin korkeatasoista tieteellistä keskustelua.
Matt Ridley taitaa nyt kuitenkin olla maailmalla jonkin verran arvostetumpi henkilö kuin Juha Knuuti.
Matthew White Ridley, 5th Viscount Ridley, DL, FRSL, FMedSci (born 7 February 1958), known commonly as Matt Ridley, is a British journalist who has written several popular science books.[1] He is also a businessman and a Conservative member of the House of Lords.[2][3]
Ridley is best known for his writings on science, the environment, and economics.[4] He has written several science books including The Red Queen (1994), Genome (1999) and The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves (2010). In 2011, he won the Hayek Prize, which "honors the book published within the past two years that best reflects Hayek’s vision of economic and individual liberty."[5] Ridley also gave the Angus Millar Lecture on "scientific heresy" at the Royal Society of Arts (RSA) in 2011.[6] He was recently elected a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences,[7] and won the Julian Simon award in March 2012.[8]
His popular TED conference talk, "When Ideas Have Sex", has over 2 million views.[9] Ridley shows how, throughout history, the engine of human progress has been the meeting and mating of ideas to make new ideas. It's not important how clever individuals are, he says; what really matters is how smart the collective brain is.[10]
Ridley was chairman of the UK bank Northern Rock from 2004 to 2007, during which period Northern Rock experienced the first run on a British bank in 150 years. Ridley chose to resign, and the bank was bailed out by the UK government leading to the nationalisation of Northern Rock.[11]
Education and career[edit]
Ridley was educated at Eton College from 1970–75 and then went on to Magdalen College, Oxford, where he completed a BA degree with First Class Honours in zoology and then took a DPhil degree in zoology in 1983.
Ridley worked as the science editor of The Economist from 1984 to 1987 and was then its Washington correspondent from 1987 to 1989 and American editor from 1990 to 1992.[12][13]
He was also founding chairman of the International Centre for Life, a non-profit science centre in Newcastle, UK.[14] He served as chairman for seven years. He formerly had been a governor of the Ditchley Foundation, which organises conferences at its stately home in Oxfordshire.[15] He is a supporter of the British Humanist Association.[16]
He was also a visiting professor at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York.
Ridley's The Rational Optimist was shortlisted for the 2011 BBC Samuel Johnson Prize.[17] His work Genome: the Autobiography of the Species in 23 Chapters was also shortlisted in 2000.[18]
In 2013 he was elected as hereditary peer in the House of Lords as a member of the Conservative Party.[19]
Books[edit]
He is the author of several works of popular science:
1993 The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature
In Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass, Alice meets the Red Queen who stays in the same place no matter how fast she runs. This book champions a Red Queen theory for the evolution of sexual reproduction: that it evolved so that the resultant genetic variation would thwart constantly mutating parasites.
1996 The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation
In The Origins of Virtue, Ridley argues that the human mind has evolved a special instinct for social exchange that enables us to reap the benefits of co-operation, ostracise those who break the social contract and avoid the trap of being 'rational fools'. It traces the evolution of society first among genes, then among cells, then in ants, vampire bats, apes and dolphins, and finally among human beings. In an interview with Foreign Policy magazine, former US President Bill Clinton named this book as one which had influenced his thinking.[20]
1999 Genome: The Autobiography of a Species in 23 Chapters
This book examines one newly discovered gene from each of the 23 human chromosomes.
2003 Nature via Nurture: Genes, Experience, & What Makes Us Human, also later released under the title The Agile Gene: How Nature Turns on Nurture in 2004
This book discusses reasons why humans can be considered to be simultaneously free-willed and motivated by instinct and culture.
2006 Francis Crick: Discoverer of the Genetic Code
Ridley's biography of Francis Crick won the Davis Prize for the history of science from the US History of Science Society.
In 2006, Ridley contributed a chapter to Richard Dawkins: How a Scientist Changed the Way We Think, a collection of essays in honour of his friend Richard Dawkins (edited by his near-namesake Mark Ridley).
Ridley's books have sold more than 800,000 copies and have been translated into twenty-seven languages.[21]
Honors and awards[edit]
In 2002, Ridley was guest editor for that year's edition of The Best American Science Writing, an anthology of popular science articles published by HarperCollins. Other guest editors in the series have included James Gleick, Timothy Ferris and Oliver Sacks. His book was listed as recommended reading [22] for advanced placement in English.
In 2010 his book The Rational Optimist (reviewed in Nature 465, 294–295 (20 May 2010)) was shortlisted for the 2011 BBC Samuel Johnson Prize.[citation needed]
In 2011, the Manhattan Institute awarded Ridley their $50,000 Hayek Prize for his book, The Rational Optimist. In his acceptance speech, Ridley said: "As Hayek understood, it is human collaboration that is necessary for society to work... the key feature of trade is that it enables us to work for each other not just for ourselves; that attempts at self-sufficiency are the true form of selfishness as well as the quick road to poverty; and that authoritarian, top-down rule is not the source of order or progress." [5]
Publications and articles[edit]
From 2010 to 2013, Ridley wrote the weekly "Mind and Matter" column for the Wall Street Journal, which "explores the science of human nature and its implications".[23]
Ridley currently writes a weekly column for The Times, which primarily focuses on science, the environment, and economics.[24]
Personal life[edit]
Ridley is the son of Matthew White Ridley, 4th Viscount Ridley (1925–2012), and Lady Anne Katharine Gabrielle Lumley (1928–2006), daughter of Lawrence Roger Lumley, 11th Earl of Scarbrough.[25] With the death of his father in 2012, Ridley succeeded him as the 5th Viscount Ridley, having taken over the running of the family estate of Blagdon Hall, near Cramlington, Northumberland, some years before.
He is a great grandson of the Victorian architect Sir Edwin Lutyens and the nephew of the late conservative Cabinet minister Nicholas Ridley, Baron Ridley of Liddesdale. His great great great great grandfather, Dudley Marjoribanks, 1st Baron Tweedmouth, created the Golden Retriever breed of dog at the Guisachan ("Place of the Firs") estate near Tomich in Invernessshire, Scotland.
Ridley is married to the neuroscientist Anya Hurlbert and lives in northern England; he has a son and a daughter.[13]
In 1980 his sister, Rose, married the British Conservative Party politician Owen Paterson, who was the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs until July 2014.[26] During this time Ridley was described as 'in many ways Paterson's personal think tank'.[27]
Northumberlandia[edit]
The Banks Group and Blagdon estate developed and sponsored the construction of Northumberlandia, or the Lady of the North, a huge land sculpture in the shape of a reclining female figure, which was part-commissioned and sponsored by Ridley.[28] Now run by a charity group called the Land Trust,[29] it is the largest landform in the world depicting the human form, and, through private funding, cost £3m to build.[30][31] Attracting over 100,000 people per year, the Northumberland art project, tourism and cultural landmark has won a global landscape architecture award and has been named ‘Miss World’.[32]
Northern Rock[edit]
Ridley was chairman of Northern Rock from 2004 to 2007, having joined the board in 1994. His father had been chairman from 1987 to 1992 and sat on the board for 30 years.[33]
In September 2007 Northern Rock became the first British bank since 1878 to suffer a run on its finances at the start of the credit crunch. It was forced to apply to the Bank of England for emergency liquidity funding, following problems caused by the financial crisis of 2007–08.[34] The failure of the bank eventually led to the nationalisation of Northern Rock. Ridley went before a parliamentary committee which criticised him for not recognising the risks of the bank's financial strategy and thereby "harming the reputation of the British banking industry."[11] He resigned as chairman in October 2007.[11]
Political and scientific views[edit]
Role of government regulation[edit]
In a 2006 edition of the on-line magazine Edge - the third culture, Ridley wrote a response to the question "What's your dangerous idea?" which was entitled "Government is the problem not the solution",[35] in which he describes his attitude to government regulation: "In every age and at every time there have been people who say we need more regulation, more government. Sometimes, they say we need it to protect exchange from corruption, to set the standards and police the rules, in which case they have a point, though often they exaggerate it... The dangerous idea we all need to learn is that the more we limit the growth of government, the better off we will all be."
In 2007 the environmentalist George Monbiot wrote an article in The Guardian connecting Ridley's libertarian economic philosophy and the £27 billion failure of Northern Rock.[36] On 1 June 2010 Monbiot followed up his previous article in the context of Matt Ridley's book The Rational Optimist, which had just been published. Monbiot took the view that Ridley had failed to learn from the collapse of Northern Rock.[37]
Ridley has responded to Monbiot on his website, stating "George Monbiot’s recent attack on me in the Guardian is misleading. I do not hate the state. In fact, my views are much more balanced than Monbiot's selective quotations imply." [38] On 19 June 2010 Monbiot countered with another article on the Guardian website, further questioning Ridley's claims and his response.[39]
In November 2010, the Wall Street Journal published a lengthy exchange between Ridley and the Microsoft founder Bill Gates on topics discussed in Ridley's book The Rational Optimist.[40][41] Gates said that "What Mr. Ridley fails to see is that worrying about the worst case—being pessimistic, to a degree—can actually help to drive a solution"; Ridley said "I am certainly not saying, 'Don't worry, be happy.' Rather, I'm saying, 'Don't despair, be ambitious.'"
Ridley recently summarised his own views on his political philosophy during the 2011 Hayek Lecture: "[T]hat the individual is not – and had not been for 120,000 years – able to support his lifestyle; that the key feature of trade is that it enables us to work for each other not just for ourselves; that there is nothing so anti-social (or impoverishing) as the pursuit of self sufficiency; and that authoritarian, top-down rule is not the source of order or progress."[42]
In an email exchange, Ridley responded to the environmental activist Mark Lynas' repeated charges of a right-wing agenda with the following reply:
On the topic of labels, you repeatedly call me a member of "the right". Again, on what grounds? I am not a reactionary in the sense of not wanting social change: I make this abundantly clear throughout my book. I am not a hierarchy lover in the sense of trusting the central authority of the state: quite the opposite. I am not a conservative who defends large monopolies, public or private: I celebrate the way competition causes creative destruction that benefits the consumer against the interest of entrenched producers. I do not preach what the rich want to hear — the rich want to hear the gospel of Monbiot, that technological change is bad, that the hoi polloi should stop clogging up airports, that expensive home-grown organic food is the way to go, that big business and big civil service should be in charge. So in what sense am I on the right? I am a social and economic liberal: I believe that economic liberty leads to greater opportunities for the poor to become less poor, which is why I am in favour of it. Market liberalism and social liberalism go hand in hand in my view.[43]
Ridley argues that the capacity of humans for change and social progress is underestimated, and denies what he sees as overly pessimistic views of global climate change[44] and Western birthrate decline.
Climate change[edit]
Matt Ridley has argued for a "lukewarm" view of climate change and against renewable energy policies that he considers damaging to the economy as well as the environment. In a report for the Global Warming Policy Foundation in 2013 he wrote:
I have written about climate change and energy policy for more than 25 years. I have come to the conclusion that current energy and climate policy is probably more dangerous, both economically and ecologically, than climate change itself. This is not the same as arguing that climate has not changed or that mankind is not partly responsible. That the climate has changed because of man-made carbon dioxide I fully accept. What I do not accept is that the change is or will be damaging, or that current policy would prevent it.[45]
Ridley argues, more controversially, based on a 2009 paper by economist Richard Tol, that climate change has done more good than harm so far and is likely to continue doing so for most of this century.[46] This is clearly expressed in his article for The Spectator:
There are many likely effects of climate change: positive and negative, economic and ecological, humanitarian and financial. And if you aggregate them all, the overall effect is positive today — and likely to stay positive until around 2080.[47]
Ridley's contention was criticized by those who pointed out that Tol found that the net effects of climate change would become negative by 2030, 50 years earlier than Ridley claimed.[48] Tol's paper was later shown to contain a number of errors, and the claim that small amounts of global warming could have net positive effect, was withdrawn by the author.[49]
In 2014, a Wall Street Journal op-ed written by Ridley was sharply challenged by Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University's Earth Institute. Sachs termed "absurd" Ridley's characterization of a paper in Science magazine by two scientists Xianyao Chen and Ka-Kit Tung. Sachs cited the data from the Science article to rebut Ridley's contentions, and stated that the "paper's conclusions are the very opposite of Ridley's".[50][51] Ridley replied that 'it is ludicrous, nasty and false to accuse me of lying or "totally misrepresenting the science." '[52]
Hydraulic fracturing[edit]
Ridley is a forthright proponent of fracking.[53] However he has been found to have breached the Parliamentary Code of Conduct by the House of Lords Commissioner for Standards for failing to disclose in debates on the subject personal interests worth at least £50,000 in Weir Group,[54] which has been described as, 'the world's largest provider of special equipment used in the process' of fracking.[55]
Yhtä hyvin - paremminkin - voitaisiin väittää, että Knuuti on yksi niistä henkilöistä, jotka ovat valmiit väittämään mustan valkoiseksi, jos katsovat siitä olevan etua urakehitykselleen puskalandiassa.
Yhtä hyvin - paremminkin - voitaisiin kysyä, että millä meriiteillä se Knuuti statiineista kirjoittelee? Missä ovat hänen tutkimuksensa statiinihoidon vaikuttavuudesta?
Aivan. NIITÄ EI OLE!
Kirjaudu sisään
UKK
Etsi
