karppaus.infon arkistoitu foorumi

"Knuutin periaate on, että hän pitäytyy faktoissa, ei lähde jankkaamaan eikä hyökkää henkilöä vastaan. Itse hän on kuitenkin joutunut henkilökohtaisen parjauksen kohteeksi. Siksi hän ei lue fanaatikkojen blogeja."

Ai niinkö??? Miten minulla on aivan eri käsitys tästäkin asiasta.

Statiinit, joiden pitäisi alentaa sydäntautiriskiä, nostavat riskiä sairastua diabetekseen. Diabetes taas nostaa sydäntautiriskiä (sen lisäksi, että se voi mm. viedä näön ja jalat ja tuhota munuaiset).

Milanossa on päädytty Kuopiotakin korkeampaan arvioon statiinien diabetesriskiä nostavastasta vaikutuksesta: ne pompsauttavat riskiä sairastua tyypin 2 diabetekseen 60 prosenttia.

Statins raise type 2 diabetes risk by 60 per cent

Herran jesta suojaamaton seksi tuntemattoman kanssa on turvallisempaa kun osa näistä lääkkeistä mitä tuputetaan.

Tyydyttynyt rasva, suola, runsas lihan käyttö – näiden vaarat ymmärretään.

Tyydyttynyt rasva ei ole mitenkään vaarallista, ainakaan satunnaistettujen tutkimusten mukaan. Kolesteroliuskovaisten suosimien kyselytytmikusten mukaan saadaan kyllä aikaiseksi muunkinlaisia uskomuksia.

Malcolm Kendrick esittää lisäperusteita kannalleen, jonka mukaan 1-2 lasillista punaviiniä hyvässä seurassa on hyväksi sydänterveydelle:

What causes heart disease part XXIX, part B.

Personer som har typ 2-diabetes och som regelbundet konsumerar måttlig mängd alkohol löper lägre risk att insjukna och avlida i hjärt-kärlsjukdom än de som inte konsumerar alkohol. Givetvis måste rådgivning om alkohol ta hänsyn till graviditet eller risk för missbruk. Kaffekonsumenter har lägre risk för hjärt-kärlsjukdom än de som inte dricker kaffe.

Conclusions and Relevance  The NYS populations with TFA restrictions experienced fewer cardiovascular events, beyond temporal trends, compared with those without restrictions.

Best for salads: hemp seed oil
 
Best for dipping: extra virgin olive oil

Best for sautéing: ghee
 
Best for roasting: coconut oil

Best for grilling: avocado oil
 
Best avoided: sunflower oil

Professor Sherif Sultan, president of the International Society for Vascular Surgery, said millions of people should stop taking the heart drugs because side effects outweigh possible benefits.

He told a conference in Brazil this month that the drugs should only be considered for patients who have had a heart attack and never for a child, woman or patient over 62 years old, as there was no evidence it could benefit them.

He also said the medication did not reduce overall death rates in anyone.

His speech ‘Reality And Myth: A Tablet A Day Will Not Keep The Doctor Away’ analysed studies on the cholesterol lowering drug and concluded the benefits were based on “statistical deception” and could not be relied upon because they were carried out by scientists employed by the drug companies.
Prof Sultan also highlighted studies showing a link with statins and increased risk of side effects including diabetes, cataracts, renal failure, liver failure, impotence, breast cancer, nerve damage, depression and muscle pains.

He said: “People are taking this drug to prevent a problem and creating a disaster.”
Prof Sultan called on drug regulators to “rewrite” guidelines on the heart drugs prescribed to up to 12 million patients in the UK, or around one-in-four adults. 

Julkaistu 6.4.2017
We are Observing the Revealing of the Utmost Medical Tragedy of All Times. Never Before in History Had the Medical Institutions Deliberately Produced a Life Threating Nutrient Deficiency in Millions of Otherwise Healthy People. Moreover, Any Negative Studies on Statin are Discouraged & Critical Researchers are Blackmailed.

High Bad Cholesterol “LDL-C” is inversely associated with mortality in most people over 60 years. This finding is inconsistent with the cholesterol hypothesis ie, that cholesterol, particularly LDL-C, is inherently atherogenic and the cause of blocked arteries.

Since elderly people with high LDL-C live as long or longer than those with low LDL-C, our analysis provides reason to question the validity of the cholesterol hypothesis.

Lack of improvement in any hard outcomes from dietary RCTs that lowered LDL cholesterol and a lack of an association between LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease in those over 60 years from a recent systematic review suggests that the conventional cholesterol hypothesis is fundamentally flawed. This may be explained by selective reporting and publication bias.

Moreover, our study provides the rationale for a re-evaluation of guidelines recommending pharmacological reduction of LDL-C in the elderly as a component of cardiovascular disease prevention strategies.


BMJ Open 2016;6:e010401. doi:10.1136