karppaus.infon arkistoitu foorumi

Tänään on 2026-06-27 23:12:51

Kaikki ajat ovat UTC+02:00




Aloita uusi ketju  Vastaa viestiin  [ 2 viestiä ] 
Julkaisija Viesti
ViestiLähetetty: 2023-10-06 22:14:06 
Poissa
ruutana
ruutana

Liittynyt: 2007-05-25 15:55:11
Viestit: 29698
… eikä myöskään glukoosinsietoon.

Systemaattiseen tutkimuskatsaus ja meta-analyysi.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37500058/

Lainaa:
Impact of saturated compared with unsaturated dietary fat on insulin sensitivity, pancreatic β-cell function and glucose tolerance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
Maria Lytrivi et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Oct.


Abstract

Background: The impact of the dietary fat type on type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains unclear.

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effects of replacing dietary saturated fatty acids (SFA) with mono- or poly-unsaturated fatty acids (MUFA and PUFA, respectively) on insulin sensitivity, pancreatic β-cell function, and glucose tolerance, as surrogate endpoints for T2D.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that replaced ≥5% of total energy intake provided by SFA with MUFA or PUFA and reported indexes of insulin sensitivity, β-cell function, and/or glucose tolerance. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) up to 9 January, 2023. Eligible interventions had to be isocaloric, with no significant difference in other macronutrients. Data were synthesized using random-effects model meta-analysis.

Results: Of 6355 records identified, 10 parallel and 20 crossover trials with 1586 participants were included. The mean age of the participants was 42 years, 47% were male, mean body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) was 26.8, median baseline fasting glucose was 5.13 mmol/L, and the median duration of interventions was 5 weeks. Replacing SFA with MUFA or PUFA had no significant effects on insulin sensitivity [standardized mean difference (SMD) SFA compared with MUFA: 0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.06 to 0.09, I2 = 0% and SMD SFA compared with PUFA: 0, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.14, I2 = 0%]. Replacing SFA with MUFA did not significantly impact the β-cell function, evaluated by the disposition index (mean difference: -12, 95% CI: -158 to 133, I2=0%). Evidence on glucose tolerance (SFA compared with MUFA or PUFA) and on β-cell function when SFA were replaced with PUFA was scant.

Conclusions: Short-term substitution of saturated with unsaturated fat does not significantly affect insulin sensitivity nor β-cell function (the latter in the SFA compared with MUFA comparison). Future studies are needed to elucidate longer term effects of dietary fat saturation on glucose homeostasis. This trial was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42020178382.

Keywords: beta-cell function; dietary fat; insulin secretion; insulin sensitivity; monounsaturated fatty acids; polyunsaturated fatty acids; saturated fatty acids; type 2 diabetes.



Ylös
   
ViestiLähetetty: 2023-10-06 22:26:22 
Poissa
ruutana
ruutana

Liittynyt: 2007-05-25 15:55:11
Viestit: 29698
Benjamin Bikman:

https://x.com/benbikmanphd/status/17103 ... G1kiC43xsw

Lainaa:
Despite all the fury against saturated fat among anti-meat advocates, the actual clinical evidence suggesting it's a problem is tremendously weak (i.e., absent). The reality is dietary fat has very little influence on #metabolic outcomes, such as #insulinresistance. I'm always glad to see this fact getting some attention:


Ylös
   
Näytä viestit ajalta:  Järjestä  
Aloita uusi ketju  Vastaa viestiin  [ 2 viestiä ] 

Kaikki ajat ovat UTC+02:00


Paikallaolijat

Käyttäjiä lukemassa tätä aluetta: Ei rekisteröityneitä käyttäjiä ja 2 vierailijaa


Et voi kirjoittaa uusia viestejä
Et voi vastata viestiketjuihin
Et voi muokata omia viestejäsi
Et voi poistaa omia viestejäsi
Et voi lähettää liitetiedostoja

Etsi tätä:
Hyppää:  
Keskustelufoorumin ohjelmisto phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
Käännös: phpBB Suomi (lurttinen, harritapio, Pettis)