rosetta_lia:lle, Linkki Nutrition Coalitionin perusteluihin:

Nutrition Coalition: Two-pager Scientific Evidence on Red Meat and Health

Pääasia ilmeisesti, että ihmiset saavat lisääntyä holtittomasti. Sikäli kun tuolla ruokavaliolla enää kykenevät?

The initial effect of the EAT-Lancet campaign seems to be not so much to promote animal welfare as to open up for “Big Ag” lucrative new markets and feed the hunger of governments for new tax bases. What starts as academic and scientific debates becomes political arguments that are dangerously simplistic and may have several detrimental consequences for both health and the environment. Of course, climate change is real and does require our attention. And, yes, livestock should be optimized but also be used as part of the solution to make our environments and food systems more sustainable and our populations healthier. But instead of undermining the foundations of our diets and the livelihoods of many, we should be tackling rather than ignoring the root causes, in particular hyperconsumerism. What we should avoid is losing ourselves in slogans, nutritional scientism, and distorted worldviews.

Basically, the diet is deficient in the following:
B12
Retinol (bioavailable vitamin A)
Vitamin D3
Iron
Vitamin K2
Sodium
And others
How is this ‘perfect’ diet going to prevent 11 million deaths per year, as claimed, if it doesn’t even reach the RDA of nutrients? Nutrient deficiencies cause diseases, lots of them. It also makes you more susceptible to disease because your immune system is on its knees.

Animals regenerate soils and therefore life, vast fields of wheat, corn and soy etc do the opposite.

Lainaa:
Animals regenerate soils and therefore life, vast fields of wheat, corn and soy etc do the opposite.

Scientists designed an obesogenic rat chow to get rodents as FAT as possible

The EAT Lancet recommendations are almost IDENTICAL

Protein: 14%
Fat: 35%
Carbohydrates: 51%

Lancet is trying to turn us into fat, weak and depressed rodents

The EAT-Lancet Diet/Vegan Diet will decrease sperm # and quality.
But, I guess that's ok if your goal is population reduction...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280539